NAJIB HAS TO DO WHAT MAHATHIR WOULD DO TO THOSE DISLOYAL TO HIM

And that is what Mukhriz the son of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is — a dead man walking. His days are numbered. So Sarawak Report was wrong when it said that Najib is on the way out and that he is now negotiating his exit plan with Dr Mahathir. It is Mukhriz who is on the way out and Najib is not negotiating the former’s exit plan with Dr Mahathir.

najib-pwtc-umno-kedah

There was a bit of a political crisis in the UK two weeks ago soon after the end of the Christmas-New Year holidays. This crisis involved the Labour Party. And this was what The Telegraphhad to say about the matter:

“Three shadow ministers have resigned in protest at Jeremy Corbyn’s ‘vindictive’ purge of moderate MPs from his front-bench amid accusations that the Labour leader’s aides had lied about the reshuffle.”

The three who resigned were Stephen Doughty, Jonathan Reynolds and Kevan Jones and they resigned out of protest over what they alleged was Corbyn’s ‘revenge reshuffle’.

The issue was actually very simple that it borders on triviality. It all started when Pat McFadden was sacked as Shadow Europe Minister for criticising Corbyn’s suggestion that military intervention by the West was partly responsible for the Paris terror attacks.

In short, Corbyn was opposed to the West attacking and bombing the Middle East and his own Shadow Europe Minister took the opposing stand. And because of this insubordination and disloyalty he was removed. And those who did not agree with his removal resigned in protest.

So there you are. Corbyn said that the West ‘creates’ terrorists by bombing their homeland. His own Minister-in-charge of Europe disagreed. And for that Corbyn sacked his Minister. Such a simple matter but with far-reaching and drastic repercussions attached to it.

What Muhyiddin Yassin, Shafie Apdal and Mukhriz Mahathir did was worse than that by far. They did not just disagree with Prime Minister Naib’s Tun Razak’s statement about whether the West should or should not bomb women, children, schools, hospitals, mosques, etc., in the Middle East. What they tried to do was to launch a coup.

Muhyiddin and Shafie have paid for their transgression. So why should Mukhriz not also pay for his? After all, his father just announced that he is not going to stop attacking the Prime Minister until he is brought down.

Some say the son should not pay for the sins of the father. True. Tun Hussein Onn did not have to pay for the sins of his father. But then he did not support what his father said and did. He did not join his father in Parti Negara to try to bring down Umno and the Prime Minister. So Hussein went on to become the third Prime Minister of Malaysia.

Mukhriz, however, is not a Hussein. He joined his father, Muhyiddin and Shafie to attack Najib. So he, of course, has to pay for it.

Anyway, the issue here is not just about him showing insubordination and disloyalty to his own party President cum Prime Minister. The issue is also performance related. Many promises were made in the run-up to the 2013 general election. But the promises are not being delivered.

It is really not strange or the first time that a Menteri Besar has met with a vote of no confidence from his own party. I was told it is not just his own party that is unhappy with him but that the Palace has indicated its displeasure as well. And that makes it a double-whammy when both your own party and the Palace are not happy with you.

I can’t remember of any state with Rulers that has not seen some sort of problems between the Palace and the Menteri Besar some time in history. Some states have even seen this more than once, three times even.

Kelantan, Terengganu, Pahang, Johor, Negeri Sembilan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis — and that makes eight — all have seen problems between the Palace and the Menteri Besar. And now if we include Kedah that makes all nine states with Rulers that at one time or another have had problems between the Rulers and the Menteri Besar.

But then officially the Rulers are not supposed to be involved in politics or interfere in the ‘system’. But that does not stop Their Highnesses from whispering into the Prime Minister’s ear regarding their displeasure. And normally the Prime Minister would take into consideration Their Highnesses displeasure and try to address the matter.

So there you are. Be very careful about how you Republicans whack the Monarchy. We have more power than what you think. You people can scream, shout and demonstrate on the streets and still nothing happens. All we need to do is to whisper into certain ears and you are a dead man walking.

And that is what Mukhriz the son of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is — a dead man walking. His days are numbered. So Sarawak Report was wrong when it said that Najib is on the way out and that he is now negotiating his exit plan with Dr Mahathir. It is Mukhriz who is on the way out and Najib is not negotiating the former’s exit plan with Dr Mahathir.

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 

NAJIB HAS TO DO WHAT MAHATHIR WOULD DO TO THOSE DISLOYAL TO HIM

And that is what Mukhriz the son of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is — a dead man walking. His days are numbered. So Sarawak Report was wrong when it said that Najib is on the way out and that he is now negotiating his exit plan with Dr Mahathir. It is Mukhriz who is on the way out and Najib is not negotiating the former’s exit plan with Dr Mahathir.

najib-pwtc-umno-kedah

There was a bit of a political crisis in the UK two weeks ago soon after the end of the Christmas-New Year holidays. This crisis involved the Labour Party. And this was what The Telegraphhad to say about the matter:

“Three shadow ministers have resigned in protest at Jeremy Corbyn’s ‘vindictive’ purge of moderate MPs from his front-bench amid accusations that the Labour leader’s aides had lied about the reshuffle.”

The three who resigned were Stephen Doughty, Jonathan Reynolds and Kevan Jones and they resigned out of protest over what they alleged was Corbyn’s ‘revenge reshuffle’.

The issue was actually very simple that it borders on triviality. It all started when Pat McFadden was sacked as Shadow Europe Minister for criticising Corbyn’s suggestion that military intervention by the West was partly responsible for the Paris terror attacks.

In short, Corbyn was opposed to the West attacking and bombing the Middle East and his own Shadow Europe Minister took the opposing stand. And because of this insubordination and disloyalty he was removed. And those who did not agree with his removal resigned in protest.

So there you are. Corbyn said that the West ‘creates’ terrorists by bombing their homeland. His own Minister-in-charge of Europe disagreed. And for that Corbyn sacked his Minister. Such a simple matter but with far-reaching and drastic repercussions attached to it.

What Muhyiddin Yassin, Shafie Apdal and Mukhriz Mahathir did was worse than that by far. They did not just disagree with Prime Minister Naib’s Tun Razak’s statement about whether the West should or should not bomb women, children, schools, hospitals, mosques, etc., in the Middle East. What they tried to do was to launch a coup.

Muhyiddin and Shafie have paid for their transgression. So why should Mukhriz not also pay for his? After all, his father just announced that he is not going to stop attacking the Prime Minister until he is brought down.

Some say the son should not pay for the sins of the father. True. Tun Hussein Onn did not have to pay for the sins of his father. But then he did not support what his father said and did. He did not join his father in Parti Negara to try to bring down Umno and the Prime Minister. So Hussein went on to become the third Prime Minister of Malaysia.

Mukhriz, however, is not a Hussein. He joined his father, Muhyiddin and Shafie to attack Najib. So he, of course, has to pay for it.

Anyway, the issue here is not just about him showing insubordination and disloyalty to his own party President cum Prime Minister. The issue is also performance related. Many promises were made in the run-up to the 2013 general election. But the promises are not being delivered.

It is really not strange or the first time that a Menteri Besar has met with a vote of no confidence from his own party. I was told it is not just his own party that is unhappy with him but that the Palace has indicated its displeasure as well. And that makes it a double-whammy when both your own party and the Palace are not happy with you.

I can’t remember of any state with Rulers that has not seen some sort of problems between the Palace and the Menteri Besar some time in history. Some states have even seen this more than once, three times even.

Kelantan, Terengganu, Pahang, Johor, Negeri Sembilan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis — and that makes eight — all have seen problems between the Palace and the Menteri Besar. And now if we include Kedah that makes all nine states with Rulers that at one time or another have had problems between the Rulers and the Menteri Besar.

But then officially the Rulers are not supposed to be involved in politics or interfere in the ‘system’. But that does not stop Their Highnesses from whispering into the Prime Minister’s ear regarding their displeasure. And normally the Prime Minister would take into consideration Their Highnesses displeasure and try to address the matter.

So there you are. Be very careful about how you Republicans whack the Monarchy. We have more power than what you think. You people can scream, shout and demonstrate on the streets and still nothing happens. All we need to do is to whisper into certain ears and you are a dead man walking.

And that is what Mukhriz the son of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is — a dead man walking. His days are numbered. So Sarawak Report was wrong when it said that Najib is on the way out and that he is now negotiating his exit plan with Dr Mahathir. It is Mukhriz who is on the way out and Najib is not negotiating the former’s exit plan with Dr Mahathir.

# Tag

Berkaitan

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

PAS uses UMDAP to attack UMNO

马华资深领袖许振南逝世 魏家祥:非常有原则的律师

郭清江.伊党按步迈向布城之路

Dakwaan 14 Ahli Parlimen UMNO tarik balik sokongan tak benar

Popular

[Video] Apa motif Mahathir & Guan Eng buat pinjaman Bon Samurai sedangkan ekonomi negara disahkan kukuh?

Kos pengeluaran arang batu turun, tarif elektrik dijangka lebih rendah

PROTON terus catat jualan memberangsangkan

Covid-19: Masa sesuai kaji semula dasar pelaburan negara

China akan beli 1.7 juta tan minyak sawit Malaysia sehingga 2023

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Analisis PRK DUN Ayer Kuning: Pengundi lebih cenderung memilih calon yang menjuarai isu tempatan

PRK DUN Ayer Kuning: Pengundi muda kembali sokong BN

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 

NAJIB HAS TO DO WHAT MAHATHIR WOULD DO TO THOSE DISLOYAL TO HIM

And that is what Mukhriz the son of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is — a dead man walking. His days are numbered. So Sarawak Report was wrong when it said that Najib is on the way out and that he is now negotiating his exit plan with Dr Mahathir. It is Mukhriz who is on the way out and Najib is not negotiating the former’s exit plan with Dr Mahathir.

najib-pwtc-umno-kedah

There was a bit of a political crisis in the UK two weeks ago soon after the end of the Christmas-New Year holidays. This crisis involved the Labour Party. And this was what The Telegraphhad to say about the matter:

“Three shadow ministers have resigned in protest at Jeremy Corbyn’s ‘vindictive’ purge of moderate MPs from his front-bench amid accusations that the Labour leader’s aides had lied about the reshuffle.”

The three who resigned were Stephen Doughty, Jonathan Reynolds and Kevan Jones and they resigned out of protest over what they alleged was Corbyn’s ‘revenge reshuffle’.

The issue was actually very simple that it borders on triviality. It all started when Pat McFadden was sacked as Shadow Europe Minister for criticising Corbyn’s suggestion that military intervention by the West was partly responsible for the Paris terror attacks.

In short, Corbyn was opposed to the West attacking and bombing the Middle East and his own Shadow Europe Minister took the opposing stand. And because of this insubordination and disloyalty he was removed. And those who did not agree with his removal resigned in protest.

So there you are. Corbyn said that the West ‘creates’ terrorists by bombing their homeland. His own Minister-in-charge of Europe disagreed. And for that Corbyn sacked his Minister. Such a simple matter but with far-reaching and drastic repercussions attached to it.

What Muhyiddin Yassin, Shafie Apdal and Mukhriz Mahathir did was worse than that by far. They did not just disagree with Prime Minister Naib’s Tun Razak’s statement about whether the West should or should not bomb women, children, schools, hospitals, mosques, etc., in the Middle East. What they tried to do was to launch a coup.

Muhyiddin and Shafie have paid for their transgression. So why should Mukhriz not also pay for his? After all, his father just announced that he is not going to stop attacking the Prime Minister until he is brought down.

Some say the son should not pay for the sins of the father. True. Tun Hussein Onn did not have to pay for the sins of his father. But then he did not support what his father said and did. He did not join his father in Parti Negara to try to bring down Umno and the Prime Minister. So Hussein went on to become the third Prime Minister of Malaysia.

Mukhriz, however, is not a Hussein. He joined his father, Muhyiddin and Shafie to attack Najib. So he, of course, has to pay for it.

Anyway, the issue here is not just about him showing insubordination and disloyalty to his own party President cum Prime Minister. The issue is also performance related. Many promises were made in the run-up to the 2013 general election. But the promises are not being delivered.

It is really not strange or the first time that a Menteri Besar has met with a vote of no confidence from his own party. I was told it is not just his own party that is unhappy with him but that the Palace has indicated its displeasure as well. And that makes it a double-whammy when both your own party and the Palace are not happy with you.

I can’t remember of any state with Rulers that has not seen some sort of problems between the Palace and the Menteri Besar some time in history. Some states have even seen this more than once, three times even.

Kelantan, Terengganu, Pahang, Johor, Negeri Sembilan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis — and that makes eight — all have seen problems between the Palace and the Menteri Besar. And now if we include Kedah that makes all nine states with Rulers that at one time or another have had problems between the Rulers and the Menteri Besar.

But then officially the Rulers are not supposed to be involved in politics or interfere in the ‘system’. But that does not stop Their Highnesses from whispering into the Prime Minister’s ear regarding their displeasure. And normally the Prime Minister would take into consideration Their Highnesses displeasure and try to address the matter.

So there you are. Be very careful about how you Republicans whack the Monarchy. We have more power than what you think. You people can scream, shout and demonstrate on the streets and still nothing happens. All we need to do is to whisper into certain ears and you are a dead man walking.

And that is what Mukhriz the son of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is — a dead man walking. His days are numbered. So Sarawak Report was wrong when it said that Najib is on the way out and that he is now negotiating his exit plan with Dr Mahathir. It is Mukhriz who is on the way out and Najib is not negotiating the former’s exit plan with Dr Mahathir.

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 
Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah