Apple must run “Samsung did not copy iPad” ads – British judge

IRONIC: Visitors walk past Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablets in Seoul. In an unexpected twist, a British judge has instructed Apple to run ads saying that Samsung did not copy its design for the iPad.

LONDON: Apple has been instructed by a British judge to run ads saying that Samsung did not copy its design for the iPad in the latest twist in the ongoing patent battles between the two tech giants, according to Bloomberg.

Judge Birss, who ruled last week that Samsung did not infringe Apple’s designs because its Galaxy Tab tablets were not “as cool” as the US company’s iPad, said Apple should publish a notice on its website and in British newspapers to correct any impression that the South Korean company copied Apple, Bloomberg said.

The notice, which is in effect an advertisement for Samsung, should remain on Apple’s website for at least six months, the report said.

The judge, however, rejected Samsung’s request that Apple be forbidden from continuing to claim that its design rights had been infringed, saying that Apple was entitled to hold the opinion, the news agency said.

Samsung said in a statement after the hearing: “Should Apple continue to make excessive legal claims based on such generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice unduly limited.”

Apple declined to comment on Judge Birss’s instruction.

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 

Apple must run “Samsung did not copy iPad” ads – British judge

IRONIC: Visitors walk past Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablets in Seoul. In an unexpected twist, a British judge has instructed Apple to run ads saying that Samsung did not copy its design for the iPad.

LONDON: Apple has been instructed by a British judge to run ads saying that Samsung did not copy its design for the iPad in the latest twist in the ongoing patent battles between the two tech giants, according to Bloomberg.

Judge Birss, who ruled last week that Samsung did not infringe Apple’s designs because its Galaxy Tab tablets were not “as cool” as the US company’s iPad, said Apple should publish a notice on its website and in British newspapers to correct any impression that the South Korean company copied Apple, Bloomberg said.

The notice, which is in effect an advertisement for Samsung, should remain on Apple’s website for at least six months, the report said.

The judge, however, rejected Samsung’s request that Apple be forbidden from continuing to claim that its design rights had been infringed, saying that Apple was entitled to hold the opinion, the news agency said.

Samsung said in a statement after the hearing: “Should Apple continue to make excessive legal claims based on such generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice unduly limited.”

Apple declined to comment on Judge Birss’s instruction.

# Tag

Berkaitan

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

Popular

[Video] Apa motif Mahathir & Guan Eng buat pinjaman Bon Samurai sedangkan ekonomi negara disahkan kukuh?

Kos pengeluaran arang batu turun, tarif elektrik dijangka lebih rendah

PROTON terus catat jualan memberangsangkan

Covid-19: Masa sesuai kaji semula dasar pelaburan negara

China akan beli 1.7 juta tan minyak sawit Malaysia sehingga 2023

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Analisis PRK DUN Ayer Kuning: Pengundi lebih cenderung memilih calon yang menjuarai isu tempatan

PRK DUN Ayer Kuning: Pengundi muda kembali sokong BN

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 

Apple must run “Samsung did not copy iPad” ads – British judge

IRONIC: Visitors walk past Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablets in Seoul. In an unexpected twist, a British judge has instructed Apple to run ads saying that Samsung did not copy its design for the iPad.

LONDON: Apple has been instructed by a British judge to run ads saying that Samsung did not copy its design for the iPad in the latest twist in the ongoing patent battles between the two tech giants, according to Bloomberg.

Judge Birss, who ruled last week that Samsung did not infringe Apple’s designs because its Galaxy Tab tablets were not “as cool” as the US company’s iPad, said Apple should publish a notice on its website and in British newspapers to correct any impression that the South Korean company copied Apple, Bloomberg said.

The notice, which is in effect an advertisement for Samsung, should remain on Apple’s website for at least six months, the report said.

The judge, however, rejected Samsung’s request that Apple be forbidden from continuing to claim that its design rights had been infringed, saying that Apple was entitled to hold the opinion, the news agency said.

Samsung said in a statement after the hearing: “Should Apple continue to make excessive legal claims based on such generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice unduly limited.”

Apple declined to comment on Judge Birss’s instruction.

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 
Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

Â