OPPOSITION’S INTERPRETATION OF PUBLIC ORDER AND PUBLIC FREEDOM

Public freedom and public order – two different terms and meanings – but to the oppositions, whose aim is to take over Putrajaya, public order is meant to allow them to stage street protest in the name of public freedom.

To the oppositions, particularly Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and PAS, public freedom is staging street protests and writing twisted and slanted articles that created doubts towards the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders.

Articulate and refined in their writings, the issues and allegations they raised and the manner they were presented were thought provoking to the upper class population whose minds are filled with idealism, as propagated by the oppositions.
That is public order to the oppositions where street protests reflect democracy practice ignoring the need to care for the feelings and economic beings of others who have different minds than theirs.

Public order to them is for the authorities to allow them to do what they want in public because that is their public freedom, not withstanding to later claim police brutality, complete with videos and photos.

The recent Bersih 3.0 rally is a good example of how they managed to mould the public’s minds on who is right and who is wrong…even Suhakam’s inquiry seems to put the blame on the police who, the public acknowledged was very soft in their handling of the situation.

And this is where the pro-BN bloggers fail to compete as they (pro-BN bloggers) lack information to disseminate to counter the allegations. The BN leaders are not co-operative in this sense as knowledge is power and without that, pro-BN bloggers have not much to go with to counter the offensive.

Failure to effectively counter the issues raised and allegations made have dampened efforts to ‘turn over or influence’ members of the public whose doubtful minds have been slowly moulded with the so-called ‘idealism’ of public freedom and public order.

One thing the opposition bloggers possess which beats pro-BN bloggers – they have the stamina and drive to continue attacking, at times driving the hammer on the same issues again and again such as scorpene and Altantuya – while pro-BN bloggers are seasonal and always keep deviating from one issue to another.

But whatever the ‘cyber war’ is coming to, both side of the political divide seem very determine to fight till the end.

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 

OPPOSITION’S INTERPRETATION OF PUBLIC ORDER AND PUBLIC FREEDOM

Public freedom and public order – two different terms and meanings – but to the oppositions, whose aim is to take over Putrajaya, public order is meant to allow them to stage street protest in the name of public freedom.

To the oppositions, particularly Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and PAS, public freedom is staging street protests and writing twisted and slanted articles that created doubts towards the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders.

Articulate and refined in their writings, the issues and allegations they raised and the manner they were presented were thought provoking to the upper class population whose minds are filled with idealism, as propagated by the oppositions.
That is public order to the oppositions where street protests reflect democracy practice ignoring the need to care for the feelings and economic beings of others who have different minds than theirs.

Public order to them is for the authorities to allow them to do what they want in public because that is their public freedom, not withstanding to later claim police brutality, complete with videos and photos.

The recent Bersih 3.0 rally is a good example of how they managed to mould the public’s minds on who is right and who is wrong…even Suhakam’s inquiry seems to put the blame on the police who, the public acknowledged was very soft in their handling of the situation.

And this is where the pro-BN bloggers fail to compete as they (pro-BN bloggers) lack information to disseminate to counter the allegations. The BN leaders are not co-operative in this sense as knowledge is power and without that, pro-BN bloggers have not much to go with to counter the offensive.

Failure to effectively counter the issues raised and allegations made have dampened efforts to ‘turn over or influence’ members of the public whose doubtful minds have been slowly moulded with the so-called ‘idealism’ of public freedom and public order.

One thing the opposition bloggers possess which beats pro-BN bloggers – they have the stamina and drive to continue attacking, at times driving the hammer on the same issues again and again such as scorpene and Altantuya – while pro-BN bloggers are seasonal and always keep deviating from one issue to another.

But whatever the ‘cyber war’ is coming to, both side of the political divide seem very determine to fight till the end.

# Tag

Berkaitan

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

PAS uses UMDAP to attack UMNO

马华资深领袖许振南逝世 魏家祥:非常有原则的律师

郭清江.伊党按步迈向布城之路

Dakwaan 14 Ahli Parlimen UMNO tarik balik sokongan tak benar

Popular

[Video] Apa motif Mahathir & Guan Eng buat pinjaman Bon Samurai sedangkan ekonomi negara disahkan kukuh?

Kos pengeluaran arang batu turun, tarif elektrik dijangka lebih rendah

PROTON terus catat jualan memberangsangkan

Covid-19: Masa sesuai kaji semula dasar pelaburan negara

China akan beli 1.7 juta tan minyak sawit Malaysia sehingga 2023

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Analisis PRK DUN Ayer Kuning: Pengundi lebih cenderung memilih calon yang menjuarai isu tempatan

PRK DUN Ayer Kuning: Pengundi muda kembali sokong BN

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 

OPPOSITION’S INTERPRETATION OF PUBLIC ORDER AND PUBLIC FREEDOM

Public freedom and public order – two different terms and meanings – but to the oppositions, whose aim is to take over Putrajaya, public order is meant to allow them to stage street protest in the name of public freedom.

To the oppositions, particularly Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and PAS, public freedom is staging street protests and writing twisted and slanted articles that created doubts towards the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders.

Articulate and refined in their writings, the issues and allegations they raised and the manner they were presented were thought provoking to the upper class population whose minds are filled with idealism, as propagated by the oppositions.
That is public order to the oppositions where street protests reflect democracy practice ignoring the need to care for the feelings and economic beings of others who have different minds than theirs.

Public order to them is for the authorities to allow them to do what they want in public because that is their public freedom, not withstanding to later claim police brutality, complete with videos and photos.

The recent Bersih 3.0 rally is a good example of how they managed to mould the public’s minds on who is right and who is wrong…even Suhakam’s inquiry seems to put the blame on the police who, the public acknowledged was very soft in their handling of the situation.

And this is where the pro-BN bloggers fail to compete as they (pro-BN bloggers) lack information to disseminate to counter the allegations. The BN leaders are not co-operative in this sense as knowledge is power and without that, pro-BN bloggers have not much to go with to counter the offensive.

Failure to effectively counter the issues raised and allegations made have dampened efforts to ‘turn over or influence’ members of the public whose doubtful minds have been slowly moulded with the so-called ‘idealism’ of public freedom and public order.

One thing the opposition bloggers possess which beats pro-BN bloggers – they have the stamina and drive to continue attacking, at times driving the hammer on the same issues again and again such as scorpene and Altantuya – while pro-BN bloggers are seasonal and always keep deviating from one issue to another.

But whatever the ‘cyber war’ is coming to, both side of the political divide seem very determine to fight till the end.

Terkini

PPRS: Usaha Kerajaan Bantu Rakyat Keluar Dari Kemiskinan – Mohd Razlan

Pilihan raya Australia: Anthony Albanese fokus pada Isu Kos Sara Hidup dan Kesejahteraan RakyatDraft

Kemenangan Besar PAP, Menguntungkan Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia-Singapura

Laluan baharu ICQS Bukit Kayu Hitam-CIQ Sadao siap lebih awal

Mahathir menyesali permusuhan dan perseteruan politik dengan Anwar – sama je dua orang ni, dendam tak sudah

UEM Edgenta meterai kontrak sediakan perkhidmatan sokongan hospital bernilai S$220 juta

Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah

 
Tolong lah subscribe - klik butang dibawah